Internal Sex Bomb

Weird Sense of Humor Sex

Researchers at the University of Sussex have received governmental funding for study of the evolutionary purpose, or creationist purpose, on why the selfish gene, or a supreme being, would simply entrust humanity with such a potent weapon of intense pleasure and feel-goodness of the human orgasm. The study will assess who, evolution, intelligent design, aliens (green ones) or God, thought that a powerful built-in pleasure infrastructure in the human body was a good idea for humans to have.

For all the positive evolutionary reasons of providing pleasure being embedded in sex for survival of the species, they will be questioning that any theory considered involved in this procreation development, or the necessary mutations, could anticipate all the negative consequences and side effects of “passion in procreation.”   Central to the research is: did God or Mother Nature ponder the harm from inventing pleasure (chemical release of dopamine and oxytocin) as the trigger for so much trouble in history, of cheating spouses, murdering of spouses and career ending scandals.

Beyond the questioning of the overall entrusting humans with such a risky tool, the study will pull apart some of the additional nuances in the difference between men and women that further exasperates the possibly “sick humor” behind the development of the orgasm in humans.

One focus for the study is the mismatch in the timing and the effort involved for men and women – both in the solitary version and partner version.  For the male, it can take less than 30 seconds and be visually stimulated, and for a female, it can take maybe an average of 20 minutes with intensive stimulation with mostly no climax during intercourse.  Counter to this speed for the male is the male limit on a single release until a refraction period occurs, and the ability for the female to have multiple orgasms, possibly with no limit until losing conscientiousness.  The only commonality is that what starts as a voluntary movement ends as an involuntary movement in both sexes in a muscular contraction, with the footnote is that men, and mostly women, would like men to have better control over the involuntary movement, biasedly labeled as “premature.” 

The theory behind pursuing the study is understanding the whole procreation set-up as a prime opportunity for disappointment in the sexes, only further heightened by pornography which may idealize intercourse, in the soft erotic version, of simultaneous orgasmic achievement as opposed to the more radical “money shot” version targeting the male audience.  (As noted by W.B. Yeats, he notes the irony of that “love has pitched its tent in the house of excrement.”  The deceit is complete in pleasure being a neighbor to urination.)

Note: A follow-up study will investigate possible other routes for the evolution of reproduction through other means such as kissing or the exchange of saliva or in the future air drop over cell phones that would be devoid of any other connotations from lower bodily placements for reproduction.